View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 3
|
[ 32 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
logithera
|
Post subject: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Monday, 14 Feb 2011, 14:26 |
|
Joined: Sunday, 01 Aug 2010, 12:15 Posts: 2
|
How to remove trojan win32 virus from my laptop. i have kaspersky 2009 antivirus but it dosent remove this virus. i dont want to format my laptop. please help me. ________________________________ keyword research ~ keyword tool ~ keyword tracking ~ affiliate elite
Last edited by logithera on Friday, 18 Feb 2011, 13:53, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ChrisTX
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Monday, 14 Feb 2011, 16:33 |
|
| A+ |
 |
Joined: Wednesday, 26 Dec 2007, 00:42 Posts: 7317
|
|
Kaspersky 2009 is somewhat old. You might want to upgrade to KAV 2011.
_________________ Game Industry Guardian (1K+).
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
hegyak
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Monday, 14 Feb 2011, 17:47 |
|
| I live here Три раза сломал клаву :) |
 |
Joined: Monday, 31 Mar 2008, 19:17 Posts: 6156 Location: Being smug somewhere fun
|
|
logithera Try Safe Mode. That should help.
_________________ The phrase "Login to http://www.clue.org and issue the GET command" springs to mind...  I moderated this forum.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
.Rar
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Monday, 14 Feb 2011, 17:50 |
|
| Dark Elf Moderator |
 |
Joined: Saturday, 27 May 2006, 01:53 Posts: 5467 Location: DHT node
|
|
Boot from the mini XP in Hiren's Boot CD and run a newer antivirus program from there, that should do.
_________________ RIP vigylant.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
djjonastybe
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 15:12 |
|
| Advanced forumer Завсегдатай |
Banned
Joined: Friday, 21 Nov 2008, 20:15 Posts: 108
|
|
Well get rid of Kaspersky 2009. At least get a free anti virus like avast instead. Avg is also good, but I prefer Avast for compatability with my defragger.
Go in safe mode and remove it yourself. Make sure you check BootExecute, Run, RunOnce etc in registry as well. make sure to check everything.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ChrisTX
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 15:16 |
|
| A+ |
 |
Joined: Wednesday, 26 Dec 2007, 00:42 Posts: 7317
|
|
AVG is crap. Avast! is ... well not good either.
As far as AVs are concerned, it only makes sense to get a scanner backed by a massive commercial company. Read: Microsoft Security Essentials ( backed by MS FEP for enterprise customers ), Kaspersky ( backed by a broad range of enterprise products ), Norton ( Symantec Endpoint Protection, et al. ).
Any AV solely targeting the non-commercial audience can be said to be crap. Simple as that, it is.
_________________ Game Industry Guardian (1K+).
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
hegyak
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 17:48 |
|
| I live here Три раза сломал клаву :) |
 |
Joined: Monday, 31 Mar 2008, 19:17 Posts: 6156 Location: Being smug somewhere fun
|
|
ChrisTX Norton has failed users a LOT from my own experiences in PC repair. Customers bring in PCs infected with spyware/adware and they had Norton on their PC. So much for a "Good" protection.
_________________ The phrase "Login to http://www.clue.org and issue the GET command" springs to mind...  I moderated this forum.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
.Rar
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 18:57 |
|
| Dark Elf Moderator |
 |
Joined: Saturday, 27 May 2006, 01:53 Posts: 5467 Location: DHT node
|
hegyak wrote: Customers bring in PCs infected with spyware/adware and they had Norton on their PC. So much for a "Good" protection. But then again, that's often the same kind of people that think simply installing an antivirus program will give their computer everlasting, impenetrable protection against viruses.  Most modern programs probably automatically update their definitions and such, though... Personally, I do fine with the old NOD32 in my desktop PC, and my laptop doesn't even run an antivirus program. I'm ultra-careful with what I run there, and pays off. 
_________________ RIP vigylant.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ChrisTX
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 19:33 |
|
| A+ |
 |
Joined: Wednesday, 26 Dec 2007, 00:42 Posts: 7317
|
hegyak wrote: Norton has failed users a LOT from my own experiences in PC repair. Customers bring in PCs infected with spyware/adware and they had Norton on their PC. So much for a "Good" protection. Norton wouldn't be my personal favorite either, but tests show that these commercial AVs (specifically RAP tests, ie. from AV comparatives) have the best detections. Norton fails from my personal experience at detecting important viruses, not many though. I am also not on the current on how Norton detects spyware/adware. I personally recommend virus squashing using DaRT and a manual look-through. However, you can boundle whatever AV you like I suppose.
_________________ Game Industry Guardian (1K+).
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Waats
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 20:09 |
|
| I live here Три раза сломал клаву :) |
 |
Joined: Tuesday, 08 Jan 2008, 10:25 Posts: 3711
|
ChrisTX wrote: AVG is crap. Avast! is ... well not good either.
As far as AVs are concerned, it only makes sense to get a scanner backed by a massive commercial company. Read: Microsoft Security Essentials ( backed by MS FEP for enterprise customers ), Kaspersky ( backed by a broad range of enterprise products ), Norton ( Symantec Endpoint Protection, et al. ).
Any AV solely targeting the non-commercial audience can be said to be crap. Simple as that, it is. I totally agree. I am using MSE for a few days and it really rocks. It detected 2 different viruses on my two computers. Avast and Avira didn't detect them.
_________________ Too many games...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RessourectoR
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 20:31 |
|
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tuesday, 15 Nov 2005, 19:09 Posts: 9593 Location: here
|
|
I also use MSE. Can't remember any false positives so far, and it scans really fast.
_________________ ℝ.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ChrisTX
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 21:03 |
|
| A+ |
 |
Joined: Wednesday, 26 Dec 2007, 00:42 Posts: 7317
|
.Rar wrote: Personally, I do fine with the old NOD32 in my desktop PC, and my laptop doesn't even run an antivirus program. I'm ultra-careful with what I run there, and pays off.  I would not recommend that. It is common that people tell you "ZOMG USE COMMON SENSE DOH", but it really isn't like that. AVs nowadays also detect exploits, intrusions and all kinds of things. Local file exploits - PDF? Flash? ecetera - are not determinable by some "common sense". MSE v2 (v1 was somewhat slow, tbh) is nowadays fast, silent and free. I would recommend running an AV for the sake of such attacks. Browser exploits can also be caught. Ok, Acrobat X, IE7+, and Chrome (work in progress) got sandboxes nowadays, so it's not so likely to be attacked by that anymore. Still, especially if you download files of the internet that could contain non-trusted binaries, possibly silently boundling malware makes having an AV only a reasonable thing. Mostly, exploit detections are faster available than a fix. Therefore, an AV can protect before an update is released to address the issue(s). Also, MS FEP here (you know the logo looks cooler?  ), but it's the same as MSE, basically.
_________________ Game Industry Guardian (1K+).
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
.Rar
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 21:17 |
|
| Dark Elf Moderator |
 |
Joined: Saturday, 27 May 2006, 01:53 Posts: 5467 Location: DHT node
|
ChrisTX wrote: I would not recommend that. It is common that people tell you "ZOMG USE COMMON SENSE DOH", but it really isn't like that. AVs nowadays also detect exploits, intrusions and all kinds of things. Local file exploits - PDF? Flash? ecetera - are not determinable by some "common sense". That's totally right, and therefore the reason I still run NOD32 on my desktop. It's not like I'm overconfident on me not doing anything stupid, as everyone makes mistakes, and also there are things that can get past this kind of common sense, as you said. It's just that the laptop's specs aren't amazing, so (despite NOD and others using very little processing power) I wanted minimal resource usage to be able to do my tasks as fast as possible. Battery duration is also a concern as I'm not always near a power socket. Quote: Still, especially if you download files of the internet that could contain non-trusted binaries, possibly silently boundling malware makes having an AV only a reasonable thing. I test all the illegally downloaded software inside a sandbox before I run it elsewhere.  On a sidenote, what do you think about VIPRE? Personally, I hadn't even heard of it until a friend told me he was using that. I visited their homepage, and they claim to be a very effective solution that requires little CPU and RAM, apparently delivering as promised (at least that's what he told me).
_________________ RIP vigylant.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RessourectoR
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 21:52 |
|
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tuesday, 15 Nov 2005, 19:09 Posts: 9593 Location: here
|
While we're at it - does anyone hae experience with software like these: DefenseWall - http://www.softsphere.com/ThreatFire - http://www.threatfire.com/I think some sticky at WBB recommended them once. They are supposed to support normal anti virus programs with some other approaches. Their claim seems a bit outdated to me, as today's AVs also have a lot of heuristic detection, don't they?
_________________ ℝ.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ChrisTX
|
Post subject: Re: kaspersky antivirus Posted: Tuesday, 15 Feb 2011, 22:57 |
|
| A+ |
 |
Joined: Wednesday, 26 Dec 2007, 00:42 Posts: 7317
|
|
ThreatFire is so credible that they can make up percentage values on how they protect you more. Nobody knows what values these are, but ok. And yes, AVs do have heuristic detection, too. Still the time frame between a signature release and virus release is for MSE for instance known to be like 12 hours. No virus spreads that fast - no matter how many zero day holes it has - to make a difference here.
And DefenseWall, oh please. That's like present in ZoneAlarm since like 2000 ? Still, pointless as it won't help much, over that.
_________________ Game Industry Guardian (1K+).
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|