View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 7 of 23
|
[ 344 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Bawsack
|
 Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 12:30 |
|
| Advanced forumer Завсегдатай |
Joined: Monday, 24 Jul 2006, 14:42
Posts: 202
Location: .-^-.
|
Thanks hCUPa for your insight,
I was hoping someone could explain this more clearly.
I think the methods you just mentioned are very helpful and saves a lot of questions being asked. 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dhdsystem
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 12:48 |
|
Joined: Thursday, 10 Aug 2006, 23:08
Posts: 9
|
|
hmm.... i'm getting a valid MAC ... and if i wrote cag.exe XX-XX-XX-XX-XX-XX 50
where XX- is a valid mac,
im getting response - account already exist ... am i doing something wrong ?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
hCUPa
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 15:05 |
|
Joined: Friday, 03 Dec 2004, 03:39
Posts: 362
|
chrismrulz wrote: i think most people get how you use the oui of intel cards instead of every character..
but theres more to it than just choosing pre-defined ones.
You are wrong. Pretty please, read my explanation about MACs few more times. Also note that manufacturers would never use random number generator for assigning macs.
Using random when bruteforcing is acceptable, but definitely not the way you did it.
_________________
--- hCUPa, retired one
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ChrisMRuLZ
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 15:13 |
|
| Super flooder Почетный графоман |
Joined: Sunday, 14 Mar 2004, 17:41
Posts: 679
Location: Austraaaaalya maaaaate!
|
|
when did i say manufacturers use random?
yes they have half of the codes at the start as there id.
the rest is not random, it is an algorithm.
plus, don't just go through intel's oui's. most cafe's wont even use them.
do it the same way as the manufacturers. yes brute-force is better. i didn't make one to compete with yours just to show how it should be done.
mine can be changed to use brute-force, but it was only to show you how a valid mac is generated.
its like back with those old keygens ixel and i made.
compare using the crc at the end and trying it vs trying every single one.. its 10x faster just from one digit.
this is 6 digits!
your trying every single one instead of using the algorithm manufacters implement when making the products.
i think s.t.a.r.s. knows what i'm talking about.. i talked to him on msn.
_________________
I piss excellence.
Last edited by ChrisMRuLZ on Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 15:17, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
vigylant
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 15:14 |
|
| I live here Три раза сломал клаву :) |
 |
Joined: Monday, 01 May 2006, 18:25
Posts: 1525
Location: My lucid dream
|
dhdsystem wrote: im getting response - account already exist ... am i doing something wrong ?
Tried some MACs that got flagged as working (but they were not)... Also got the "account already exists"...
Also, when testing a mac, it says in the start blabla, _cag.log 1 unique account... But the file is empty 
_________________
♫
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
drsealion
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 15:22 |
|
| Super flooder Почетный графоман |
Joined: Saturday, 12 Aug 2006, 21:42
Posts: 531
|
lol true, that happened to me also 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ChrisMRuLZ
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 15:23 |
|
| Super flooder Почетный графоман |
Joined: Sunday, 14 Mar 2004, 17:41
Posts: 679
Location: Austraaaaalya maaaaate!
|
vigylant wrote: dhdsystem wrote: im getting response - account already exist ... am i doing something wrong ? Tried some MACs that got flagged as working (but they were not)... Also got the "account already exists"... Also, when testing a mac, it says in the start blabla, _cag.log 1 unique account... But the file is empty yes there are a few problems with hCUPa's program.. but atleast it works for what you all use it for.
p.s. there are extra linebreaks in _caclog.txt
should use
if(somereadfilefunction("caclog.txt") is nothing) then
write(account1)
else
write(somereadfilefunction("caclog.txt") & CrLf & account1)
end if
(of course that is like pseudo-code..)
_________________
I piss excellence.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
randomjester
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 16:18 |
|
| Advanced forumer Завсегдатай |
Joined: Tuesday, 26 Apr 2005, 00:09
Posts: 146
|
|
@hCUPa
Thank you for the explanation.
I'm still a little confused on how to format it for the program though.
Would any of these formats be correct?
CAG.exe 00-02-B3-00-00-01 5 00-02-B3-FF-FF-FE
CAG.exe 00-02-B3-XX-XX-XX 5 00-02-B3-FF-FF-FE
CAG.exe 00-02-B3-XX-XX-XX 5 00-02-B3-10-D6-9B
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
hCUPa
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 16:36 |
|
Joined: Friday, 03 Dec 2004, 03:39
Posts: 362
|
randomjester wrote: @hCUPa
Thank you for the explanation.
I'm still a little confused on how to format it for the program though.
Would any of these formats be correct?
CAG.exe 00-02-B3-00-00-01 5 00-02-B3-FF-FF-FE This one is not bruteforcing at all. Full MAC supplied, 3rd argument ignored Quote: CAG.exe 00-02-B3-XX-XX-XX 5 00-02-B3-FF-FF-FE This one gonna try macs from 00-02-B3-FF-FF-FE to 00-02-B3-FF-FF-FF (basically just 2 addresses). Quote: CAG.exe 00-02-B3-XX-XX-XX 5 00-02-B3-10-D6-9B
This one gonna try macs from 00-02-B3-10-D6-9B to 00-02-B3-FF-FF-FF (15673700 addresses).
_________________
--- hCUPa, retired one
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
randomjester
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 16:53 |
|
| Advanced forumer Завсегдатай |
Joined: Tuesday, 26 Apr 2005, 00:09
Posts: 146
|
|
@hCUPa
Alright, I think I completely understand now.
Thanks again.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ChrisMRuLZ
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 17:06 |
|
| Super flooder Почетный графоман |
Joined: Sunday, 14 Mar 2004, 17:41
Posts: 679
Location: Austraaaaalya maaaaate!
|
updated with hCUPa's latest version and the patch i apply to the old ones.. http://tinyurl.com/os5ll
_________________
I piss excellence.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Inferior-Object
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 17:11 |
|
| Advanced forumer Завсегдатай |
Joined: Friday, 10 Mar 2006, 00:45
Posts: 80
|
|
So if set this too say 10000 macs generate and left it all day, Do you think it would find any valid macs ? or ones that work on steamcafe ?
_________________ 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ChrisMRuLZ
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 17:15 |
|
| Super flooder Почетный графоман |
Joined: Sunday, 14 Mar 2004, 17:41
Posts: 679
Location: Austraaaaalya maaaaate!
|
Inferior-Object wrote: So if set this too say 10000 macs generate and left it all day, Do you think it would find any valid macs ? or ones that work on steamcafe ?
don't know.. but it'll surely slow down the CAC network 
i figured out the reason why my first version using packets like hcupa's went on and off.. it simply slows down the network with even one person doing it alot.
_________________
I piss excellence.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Lobo_Earthworm
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 17:26 |
|
| Advanced forumer Завсегдатай |
Joined: Tuesday, 11 Jan 2005, 01:19
Posts: 89
|
|
I got error : can't open log file.
_________________
Idiots try to maintain order - A genius can control chaos.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
damacc
|
Post subject: Posted: Monday, 14 Aug 2006, 18:02 |
|
Joined: Sunday, 01 Jan 2006, 19:36
Posts: 38
Location: 837G1UM
|
doesnt work
why dont u just make 1 program? im trying to do someting with raw sockets atm.... but its not working
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Forum rules
IRC (Chat)
Non-Steam FAQ
Register
Search
Login
| 
